positivity core functionality #
This file sets up the positivity tactic and the @[positivity] attribute,
which allow for plugging in new positivity functionality around a positivity-based driver.
The actual behavior is in @[positivity]-tagged definitions in Tactic.Positivity.Basic
and elsewhere.
The result of positivity running on an expression e of type α.
- positive {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {zα : Q(Zero «$α»)} {pα : Q(PartialOrder «$α»)} {e : Q(«$α»)} (pf : Q(0 < «$e»)) : Strictness zα pα e
- nonnegative {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {zα : Q(Zero «$α»)} {pα : Q(PartialOrder «$α»)} {e : Q(«$α»)} (pf : Q(0 ≤ «$e»)) : Strictness zα pα e
- nonzero {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {zα : Q(Zero «$α»)} {pα : Q(PartialOrder «$α»)} {e : Q(«$α»)} (pf : Q(«$e» ≠ 0)) : Strictness zα pα e
- none {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {zα : Q(Zero «$α»)} {pα : Q(PartialOrder «$α»)} {e : Q(«$α»)} : Strictness zα pα e
Instances For
Instances For
Gives a generic description of the positivity result.
Instances For
Extract a proof that e is positive, if possible, from Strictness information about e.
Instances For
Extract a proof that e is nonnegative, if possible, from Strictness information about e.
Instances For
Extract a proof that e is nonzero, if possible, from Strictness information about e.
Instances For
An extension for positivity.
- eval {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} (zα : Q(Zero «$α»)) (pα : Q(PartialOrder «$α»)) (e : Q(«$α»)) : Lean.MetaM (Strictness zα pα e)
Attempts to prove an expression
e : αis>0,≥0, or≠0.
Instances For
Read a positivity extension from a declaration of the right type.
Instances For
Each positivity extension is labelled with a collection of patterns
which determine the expressions to which it should be applied.
Instances For
Environment extensions for positivity declarations
Converts a MetaM Strictness which can fail
into one that never fails and returns .none instead.
Instances For
Converts a MetaM Strictness which can return .none
into one which never returns .none but fails instead.
Instances For
Attempts to prove a Strictness result when e evaluates to a literal number.
Instances For
Attempts to prove that e ≥ 0 using zero_le in a CanonicallyOrderedAdd monoid.
Instances For
A variation on assumption when the hypothesis is lo ≤ e where lo is a numeral.
Instances For
A variation on assumption when the hypothesis is lo < e where lo is a numeral.
Instances For
A variation on assumption when the hypothesis is x = e where x is a numeral.
Instances For
A variation on assumption which checks if the hypothesis ldecl is a [</≤/=] e
where a is a numeral.
Instances For
The main combinator which combines multiple positivity results.
It assumes t₁ has already been run for a result, and runs t₂ and takes the best result.
It will skip t₂ if t₁ is already a proof of .positive, and can also combine
.nonnegative and .nonzero to produce a .positive result.
Instances For
Run each registered positivity extension on an expression, returning a NormNum.Result.
Instances For
Given an expression e, use the core method of the positivity tactic to prove it positive,
or, failing that, nonnegative; return a Boolean (signalling whether the strict or non-strict
inequality was established) together with the proof as an expression.
Instances For
Given an expression e, use the core method of the positivity tactic to prove it nonnegative.
Instances For
An auxiliary entry point to the positivity tactic. Given a proposition t of the form
0 [≤/</≠] e, attempts to recurse on the structure of t to prove it. It returns a proof
or fails.
Instances For
The main entry point to the positivity tactic. Given a goal goal of the form 0 [≤/</≠] e,
attempts to recurse on the structure of e to prove the goal.
It will either close goal or fail.
Instances For
Tactic solving goals of the form 0 ≤ x, 0 < x and x ≠ 0. The tactic works recursively
according to the syntax of the expression x, if the atoms composing the expression all have
numeric lower bounds which can be proved positive/nonnegative/nonzero by norm_num. This tactic
either closes the goal or fails.
positivity [t₁, …, tₙ] first executes have := t₁; …; have := tₙ in the current goal,
then runs positivity. This is useful when positivity needs derived premises such as 0 < y
for division/reciprocal, or 0 ≤ x for real powers.
Examples:
example {a : ℤ} (ha : 3 < a) : 0 ≤ a ^ 3 + a := by positivity
example {a : ℤ} (ha : 1 < a) : 0 < |(3:ℤ) + a| := by positivity
example {b : ℤ} : 0 ≤ max (-3) (b ^ 2) := by positivity
example {a b c d : ℝ} (hab : 0 < a * b) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hcd : c < d) :
0 < a ^ c + 1 / (d - c) := by
positivity [sub_pos_of_lt hcd, pos_of_mul_pos_left hab hb]
Instances For
We set up positivity as a first-pass discharger for gcongr side goals.
We register positivity with the hint tactic.